Background & challenge

The brand ran Sponsored Products heavily, with Sponsored Brands “on the side.” Performance was judged mainly via console ROAS on promoted ASINs and last-touch conversion-time reporting.

The team suspected two things but couldn’t prove them:

  • Generic search might be driving more brand/portfolio value than console shows.
  • Sponsored Brands might be undervalued vs Sponsored Products on high-intent generic queries.

They brought us in to answer:

  • How do SP and SB perform together on the same queries?
  • How much value is coming from halo sales on non-promoted ASINs?
  • Where are we leaking money in the funnel — targeting, PDP, or offer?

Hero AMC modules

  • Cross Ad Type Search Term NTB Lens (SP vs SB by query)
  • Search Term Funnel Leak Map (DPV → purchase efficiency)
  • Halo & Conversion-Time QA (traffic-time vs conversion-time)

Goal: replace “promoted-only ROAS” thinking with a portfolio-aware, funnel-aware operating model.

AMC setup & method

We built the AMC workspace around three analytical domains and ran three core modules.

Cross Ad Type Search Term NTB Lens

SP vs SB by search term: spend, clicks, sales, ROAS, halo share.

  • Unified view of SP and SB for the same query.
  • Measured click-attributed sales and halo share (non-promoted ASINs).
  • Highlighted where SB should be funded, not treated as “extra”.

Search Term Funnel Leak Map

Search term × tracked ASIN: DPV, purchases, DPV→purchase rate.

  • Mapped DPV → purchase at query × ASIN level (click-attributed).
  • Identified whether issues were traffic-quality or PDP/offer fit.
  • Layered halo share to understand portfolio behavior.

Traffic-Time vs Conversion-Time QA (SB)

Lag-aware measurement to avoid cutting winners too early.

  • Compared traffic-time vs conversion-time aggregation for SB.
  • Flagged “laggy” generic terms that under-report in short conversion windows.
  • Defined guardrails for in-flight optimization vs finance truth.

What we found

Clear evidence of underfunded SB, major halo contribution, and where the funnel really leaked.

Finding #1 — SB punches above its weight, halo is huge

A console-only view would systematically undervalue the real growth drivers.

  • Monthly spend: $42.4K | click-attributed sales: $102.2K | click ROAS: 2.41
  • Halo sales: $30.4K (~30% of click-attributed sales on non-promoted ASINs)
  • SP vs SB: SB delivered higher CTR, higher ROAS, and higher halo share of sales

Mix snapshot (by ad product)

  • SP — 80.5% spend share | 76.1% sales share | ROAS 2.28 | CTR 0.77% | halo share 28.1%
  • SB — 19.5% spend share | 23.9% sales share | ROAS 2.96 | CTR 1.32% | halo share 35.2%

Implication: SB is underfunded and halo is not optional. If you optimize promoted-only ROAS, you will cut campaigns that actually grow the portfolio.

Finding #2 — SB outperformed SP on key generic query clusters

On shared search terms, SB often beat SP by +1.5–4.0 ROAS points.

  • Generic glove terms (e.g., “plastic gloves”, “vinyl gloves”, “food prep gloves”) consistently favored SB.
  • Nutrition terms (e.g., “mct oil”, “electrolytes powder”) showed SB as underfunded but highly incremental.
  • SB also delivered higher halo share — pulling shoppers deeper into the catalog.

Strategic takeaway: stop the default “SP first, SB if budget allows.” Instead, shift budget on specific generic terms where SB clearly outperforms — and measure on total + halo sales.

Finding #3 — Funnel leakage was mostly DPV → purchase

In this dataset ATC was zero, so we used DPV → purchases as the funnel.

  • High-efficiency glove terms showed strong DPV volume and ~17–21% DPV→purchase rates, plus meaningful halo.
  • DPV-heavy, purchase-light terms flagged PDP/offer mismatch (C8 MCT), PDP competitiveness (coconut oil), and claim sensitivity (electrolytes).
  • Halo patterns helped separate “gateway behavior” from true conversion issues.

Key point: many “performance problems” were not keyword problems — they were PDP/offer problems that PPC alone can’t fix.

Finding #4 — “Gateway” ASIN behavior surfaced via halo

One promoted ASIN drove ~$1.2K sales with 100% halo share.

  • The promoted product pulled shoppers in — but they purchased other items instead.
  • If the goal is direct ROAS: promote what people actually buy.
  • If the goal is portfolio expansion: keep the gateway, but optimize the journey (store path, variations, bundles).

Finding #5 — Measurement guardrails (traffic-time vs conversion-time)

Some generic terms were “laggy” and under-reported in short conversion windows.

  • Overall alignment was good (QA passed).
  • A subset of generic terms showed 20–40% lower sales on conversion-time within the same window.
  • Recommendation: use traffic-time (or lag-aware reporting) for in-flight optimization; keep conversion-time for closed-period finance truth.

Data caveat — SP funnel events were not trustworthy yet

SP DPV/ATC click fields returned zero in the export.

  • We treated SP funnel leakage as instrumentation caveat, not business truth.
  • Recommended a follow-up schema/threshold QA to confirm which fields populate in their AMC instance.
  • Also checked whether granular breakdowns triggered privacy suppression.

Action plan the PPC lead took

We translated findings into a Monday-morning execution plan:

  • Budget shifts: move 10–20% of SP spend on key generic clusters into SB where SB clearly wins.
  • Non-bid fixes: prioritize PDP/offer work for DPV-heavy, purchase-light clusters (C8 MCT, coconut oil, electrolytes).
  • Halo strategy: treat the 100% halo ASIN as a deliberate gateway and optimize the downstream journey.

Reporting upgrades

  • Cross Ad Type Search Term NTB + Halo Lens (SP vs SB on shared queries)
  • Search Term × ASIN Funnel Efficiency (DPV→purchase + halo share)
  • SB Traffic-Time vs Conversion-Time QA for laggy generic terms

Result: a defensible, CMO-friendly narrative about where generic search truly works, where the funnel breaks, and where SB deserves budget over SP on the same query.

Want the “truth” behind your generic search spend?

If you’re investing seriously in Sponsored Ads and you suspect the console is hiding the real story, AMC Sponsored Ads Radar can surface where to shift budget, where halo is driving portfolio value, and where PDP/offer fixes matter more than bid tweaks.

Book a Radar Intro Call We’ll tell you if Radar is a fit for your setup.